By Andy Kerr
"Look at all that cormorant crap,"
U.S. Forest Service Deputy Chief Jim Furnish said
as our official van crossed the U.S. 101 bridge
over Oregon's Umpqua River. Cormorants were
packed densely into the few remaining roosting
trees, and the Sitka spruce and Douglas-fir were
flocked white with their droppings.
Here I was in the forest where my professional
conservation career started a quarter-century
ago. I was working as an activist in the Siuslaw
National Forest, fighting the Forest Service and
desperately trying to throw sand in the gears of
this great timber machine. No national forest in
the system cut more board feet per acre; at the
peak, a truckload of virgin forest left the
Siuslaw every six minutes.
By 1999, reform had swept the Forest Service,
and hardly any timbernone of any
significant diameterwas coming off the
Siuslaw. A revolution had occurred at the top of
the agency, thanks to Bill Clinton and Al Gore.
Revolution had also welled up from below, thanks
to so many clear-cuts.
The excitement in Furnish's voice on this
Labor Day weekend tour reflected these changes.
Here was a deputy chief and former supervisor of
the 630,000-acre Siuslaw National Forest in
Oregon's Coast Range marveling at big
treesand not for their lumber.
When I was a budding activist in 1973, the
Siuslaw cut was 420 million board feet. The
Siuslaw supervisor was F. Dale Robertson, a
wunderkind who later became the youngest chief of
the Forest Service. The top Siuslaw job was a
plum position: big timber volume equaled big
staff and budget. Robertson will be remembered as
the Chief who didn't make the change from the old
Forest Service.
Around 1980, I'd been invited to address
Forest Service research scientists meeting at the
edge of the Siuslaw National Forest on the Oregon
coast. I ended up in a bar with two scientists. A
couple of drinks down, one forest ecologist
pessimistically complained that nothing much
would ever change, that the Forest Service would
log it all. The wildlife biologist finally boomed
out, "Oh, Jerry, things are going to
change!"
"How?" pleaded Jerry Franklin, who
as already the guru for old-growth Douglas-fir
forests.
"Because sonsabitches like this are going
to sue the bastards," said Jack Ward Thomas,
as his big hand slapped my shoulder, knocking me
askew. The Siuslaw was a breeding ground for what
Thomas called "combat biology." His
approach worked, and Thomas was later appointed
the first chief of the Forest Service who didn't
have sawdust flowing through his veins.
In 1978, a law student named Mike Axline,
working for what became the Oregon Natural
Resources Council, filed the first administrative
challenge of a federal timber sale that raised
the spotted owl issue. This Siuslaw timber sale
challenge was the beginning of a parade of
successful appeals and litigation that virtually
halted old-growth logging throughout the range of
the species. Axline is still leading the charge
with the Western Environmental Law Center.
The first spotted owl plan called for 300
acres of old-growth forest being left around 400
spotted owl nests scattered across western Oregon
and Washington. The Forest Service agreed to take
responsibility for 300 pairs, and the Bureau of
Land Management took eighty. State and private
landowners would be responsible for the remaining
twenty pairs.
Trying to determine if any science supported
the plan, I asked a Siuslaw National Forest
wildlife biologist how 300 acres of old-growth
were allocated to each pair. "It was what we
thought we could get past the timber boys,"
he confessed. Later, scientific studies placed
the habitat needs per nesting pair at 2,000 to
4,500 acres and a viable population at several
thousand nesting pairs.
No private or state landowner would do even a
token amount for the owl. The result was that for
the unclaimed twenty pairs, the plan fell apart,
leading to litigation under the Endangered
Species Act. Today public forest debates are in
millions, not thousands, of acres.
As the spotted owl rose in political
prominence, the issue had to diversity. Salmon
were preferred as the next species of
opportunity, but the science hadn't quite
developed. A small group of us visited David
Marshall, who had recently retired as the
endangered species head for the Pacific Region of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. We needed to
petition for another endangered species to move
the sole burden from the spotted owl and asked
him which species would work. Marshall said,
"Marbled murrelet."
"Is that a bird?" I asked.
Kim Nelson, an Oregon State University
student, heard a birdcall on Mary's Peak, the
tallest mountain in Oregon's Coast Range, in 1985
that puzzled her. It sounded like a marbled
murrelet, a seabird known to hang out just beyond
the coastal breakers, but she was at least thirty
miles from the ocean. The calls Nelson heard were
an early clue to the nesting habits of the bird,
and the discovery that the marbled murrelet nests
in old-growth trees up to fifty miles inland came
soon after. Nelson has since become the premier
marbled murrelet expert and the species has
joined the northern spotted owl and coastal runs
of salmon on the endangered species list. With
these charismatic species coexisting in Oregon's
Coast Range, the timber cut on the Siuslaw fell
dramatically. Since 1994, less than 10 million
board feet have been sold each year, and nothing
but small second-growth timber is coming out.
One of the tour objectives this Labor Day
weekend was to examine road rehabilitation on the
Siuslaw. At its peak, the Siuslaw's road system
was 2,500 miles. Since the Northwest Forest Plan,
700 miles have been rehabilitated. Water bars
drain uphill ditches to the downhill side of the
road and are bladed every few hundred feet to
make the road hydrologically invisible to the
watershed.
If any large tree falls across the road today
on the Siuslaw, it's no longer bucked and sold;
it's helicoptered out and anchored in a stream to
help fish. The large logs create the gravel bars
necessary for spawning salmon and the pools
needed during their rearing periods.
As we walked along Knowles Creek, seeing how
many hand-placed and mechanically anchored large
logs were doing, the contrast between the parts
of the creek with and without large logs was
striking. Furnish was ecstatic that the fish
numbers were up. My measure of the man was
changing rapidly. Here was a Forest Service guy
who wasn't just talking green, but one who was
also walking green. He had eliminated commercial
timber as a purpose of the Siuslaw National
Forest.
For many decades, the national forests were
managed by bureaucrats maximizing budgets by
maximizing timber. Today the Forest Service is
struggling for a new purpose, and it's being
pulled in two directions: industrial-style
recreation and active ecological restoration.
Realistically, the conservation community is not
the likely successor to big timber in serving as
the Forest Service's primary constituency and
lobbying force in Congress.
Under George W. Bush, we shall see just how
deep and permanent the greening of the Forest
Service is. My fear is that the revolution is
incomplete. Conservationists are mopping up the
pockets of resistance to logging on federal lands
in the Pacific Northwest. It was going well at
the bottom and at the top, but in the middle, the
unrepentant timber beasts have holed up in the
regional offices, waiting for their day of
liberation when they can get back to work.
From lawsuits to political mandates, a
twenty-five-year battle, the Siuslaw National
Forest has changed for the better, but Furnish
likely won't stay to see them through. He said he
didn't want to be chief and would be retiring
about the same time as Clinton. I think he knew
his task was to force serious change and that
he'd pay the price for being a reformer.
Andy Kerr lives in Oregon's Rogue Valley.
He worked for twenty years with the Oregon
Natural Resources Council, fighting to save
Northwest forests.
Kerr, Andy. 2001. Changes on the Siuslaw. Forest
Magazine. March/April. 46.
|