- Speeches
- Articles
- Links
- Quotes
See also the profile
on Andy Kerr and Speeches.
Speeches
Endless Growth or
the End of Growth? is
my stock speech on the subject. My 25 Actions to End Growth in
Oregon speech includes
specifics ideas on how to do it.
Articles
It's
time to question growth is
a column from the Wallowa County Chieftain.
ONRC's
executive director outlines 100-year plan for
state was an excerpt of a
1994 speech
published in The Oregonian.
Wasting Away
in LaBendmondville from The Source
is about a region I've never lived in, but
is increasingly difficult to pass through.
The
Overfilling of Ashland is
on my new home.
Endless Growth or
the End of Growth considers
choices in a brief essay that considers
population increase and the resultant doubling
times.
Growth Not Good
for Most Oregonians from Oregon
Futures.
As
Population Rises, Civility Declines
argues that as Oregon grows in population,
it is losing its small-town friendliness.
Rudeness is a rational response to cope with
overcrowding.
Dirty
Air: It's Everyone's Problem appeared
in the Ashland Daily Tidings and
explains how per capita reductions in air
pollution will not result in cleaner air as long
as population is increasing.
The
Best Laid Plans was
published in 1981 and is my first published call
about the need to end growth in Oregon.
Crossroads
approaching for Oregon was
an opinion piece in The Oregonian about
the need to end growth in 1983.
The
Human Footprint The human
footprint is a concept pioneered by Redefining
Progress which considers how much surface
of the Earth is required to sustain a person at
various standards of living. You can estimate
your own footprint.
100-Year
Plan was given at the 1994 Oregon Natural
Resources Council Conference.
Links
1000
Friends of Oregon is the premier
statewide organization advocating for the
management of growth.
Center
for a New American Dream has a motto of
"more fun, less stuff."
Northwest
Environment Watch is a fine think tank on
environmental and sustainability issues and has
several great publications.
Population Coalition does
a tremendous job working the population issue. I
serve on their Council of Advocates.
Redefining
Progress is best known for its work with
the Genuine Progress Indicator as a rational
alternative to the Gross Domestic Product and for
the concept of a person's ecological footprint.
Quotes
It is not good for a
man to be kept perforce at all times in the
presence of his species.... Nor is there much
satisfaction in contemplating the world with
nothing left to the spontaneous activity of
nature; with every rood of land brought into
cultivation, which is capable of growing food for
human beings; every flowery waste or natural
pasturage plowed up, all quadrupeds or birds
which are not domesticated for man's use
exterminated as his rivals for food, every
hedgerow or superfluous tree rooted out, and
scarcely a place left where a wild shrub or
flower could growth without being eradicated as a
weed in the name of improved agriculture. If the
earth must lose that great portion of its
pleasantness which it owes to things that the
unlimited increase of wealth and population would
extirpate from it, for the mere purpose of
enabling it to support a larger, but not a
happier or better population, I sincerely hope,
for the sake of posterity, that they will be
content to be stationary, long before necessity
compels them to it.
John Stuart Mill
Unlike plagues of the
dark ages or contemporary diseases we do not
understand, the modern plague of overpopulation
is soluble by means we have discovered and with
resources we possess. What is lacking is not
sufficient knowledge of the solution but
universal consciousness of the gravity f the
problem and education of the billions who are its
victim.
Dr. Martin Luther
King, Jr.
Normal is getting dressed in clothes that
you buy for work, driving through traffic in a
car that you are still paying for, in order to
get to a job that you need so you can pay for the
clothes, car and the house that you leave empty
all day in order to afford to live in it.
Ellen Goodman, as quoted in All
Consuming Passion: Waking up from the
American Dream (page 2, 3rd ed. 1998, New
Road Map Foundation and Northwest Environment
Watch (both Seattle).
Sagebrush subdivisions, coastal condomania,
and the ravenous rampage of suburbia in the
Willamette Valley all threaten to mock Oregon's
status as the environmental model for the nation.
Tom McCall, Governor of Oregon (1973)
It's a step toward precision and
sustainability to say growth when you mean
increase in physical size, and development when
you mean, as the dictionary says, "to
realize the potentialities of, or bring to a
fuller, greater and better state."
Development means to get better; growth mean to
get bigger.
Donnella Meadows
Human beings now use or co-opt some 40
percent of the food available to all land animals
and about 45 percent of the available freshwater
flows.
Anne and Paul Eherlich, Betrayal of
Science and Reason (1996, pg. 14)
At what point do we question the whole notion
of creating wealth for the sake of having dollars
and give that more value than creating community?
Sen. Avel Gordly, quoted in The
Oregonian (Dec. 16, 1998))
Suppose you own a pond on which a water
lily is growing. The lily plant doubles in size
each day. If the lily were allowed to grow
unchecked, it would completely cover the pond in
30 days, choking off the other forms of life in
the water. For a long time the lily plant seems
small, and so you decide not to worry about
cutting it back until it covers half the point.
On what day will that be? On the 29th day, of
course. You have one day to save the pond.
Meadows, Donnella, et al., Limits to
Growth (2nd Ed., 1972-74)
There is room in the world, no doubt, and
even in the old countries for a great increase of
population, supposing the arts of life to go on
improving, and capital to increase. But even if
innocuous, I confess I see very little reason for
desiring it. The density of population necessary
to enable mankind to maintain, in the greatest
degree, all the advantages both of co-operation
and of social intercourse, has, in all the most
populous countries, been attained.
A population may be too crowded, though all
be amply supplied with food and raiment. It is
not good for man to be kept perforce at all times
in the presence of his species. A world from
which solitude is extirpated, is a very poor
ideal. Solitude, in the sense of being often
alone, is essential to any depth of meditation or
of character; and solitude in the presence of
natural beauty and grandeur is the cradle of
thoughts and aspirations which are not only good
for the individual, but which society could ill
do without. Nor is their much satisfaction in
contemplating the world with nothing left to the
spontaneous activity of nature; with every rood
of land brought into cultivation, which is
capable of growing food for human beings; every
flowery waste or natural pasture plowed up, all
quadrupeds or birds which are not domesticated
for man's use exterminated as his rivals for
food, every hedgerow or superfluous tree rooted
out, and scarcely a place left where a wild shrub
or flower could grow without being eradicated as
a weed in the name of improved agriculture.
If the earth must lose that great
proportion of its pleasantness which it owes to
things that the unlimited increase of wealth and
population would extirpate from it, for the mere
purpose of enabling it to support a larger, but
not a better or a happier population, I sincerely
hope, for the sake of posterity, that they will
be content to be stationary, long before
necessity compels them to it.
It is scarcely necessary to remark that a
stationary condition of capital and population
implies not stationary state of human
improvement. There would be as much scope as ever
for all kinds of mental culture, and moral and
social progress; as much room for improving the
Art of Living, and much more likelihood of its
being improved, when minds ceased to be engrossed
by the Art of Getting On. Even the industrial
arts might be cultivated, that instead of serving
no purpose but the increase of wealth, industrial
improvements would produce their legitimate
effect, that of abridging labor.
Hitherto it is questionable if all the
mechanical inventions yet made have lightened the
day's toil of any human being. They have enabled
an increased number of manufacturers to make
fortunes. They have increased the comforts of the
middle classes. But they have not yet begun to
effect those great changes in human destiny,
which it is in their nature and in their futurity
to accomplish. Only when, in addition to just
institutions, mankind shall be under the
deliberate guidance of judicious foresight, can
the conquests made by the intellect and energy of
scientific discovers become the means of
improving and elevating the universal lot.
John Stuart Mill, "Of the Stationary
State" (Chapter 6) in Principles of
Political Economy (Chapter 6) Books IV
and V, pp. 116-117. New York: Penguin Books,
(reprint of 1848 edition). [In 1848, the
human population of the Earth was one
billion.]
Moyers: What happens to the idea of the
dignity of the human species if population growth
continues at its present rate?
Asimov: It will be completely destroyed. I
will use what I call my bathroom metaphor. Two
people live in an apartment and their are two
bathrooms, then both have the freedom of the
bathroom. You can go to the bathroom anytime you
want, and stay as long as you want, for whatever
you need. Everyone believes in the freedom of the
bathroom. It should be right there in the
Constitution. But if you have 20 people in the
apartment and two bathrooms, no matter how much
every person believes in the freedom of the
bathroom, there is no such thing. You have to set
up times for each person, you have to bang at the
door, "Aren't you through yet?" and so
on.
The same way democracy cannot survive
overpopulation. Human dignity cannot survive it.
Convenience and decency cannot survive it. As you
put more and more people into the world, the
value of life not only declines, it disappears.
It doesn't matter if someone dies. The more
people there are the less one individual matters.
Issac Asimov, quoted in A World of
Ideas by Bill Moyers (1989)
Where do we want to live? Remarkably,
Perspective editors found America's ideal place
to live has changed little over the past 60
years. A Gallup survey in 1937 found that 58
percent of those interviewed said they wanted to
live on a farm (30 percent) or small town (28
percent). In a Gallup survey conducted last
November, just as many--60 percent--expressed
similar preferences, with 24% of those questioned
saying that farm living was the life for them and
36 percent preferring small-town life.
Washington Post National Weekly Edition,
3/8/98
The ecologically
destructive path we are on is as if all of
humanity is in a giant car heading at a brick
wall at 100 miles per hour and everyone in it is
arguing about where to sit. There are a few
screaming to put on the brakes and turn the
wheel, but they are locked in the trunk.
David Suzuki
|