By Andy Kerr
Some Oregonians are worrying that today's
Oregon is not as civil as it once was. If
Portland continues on its present course of
population increase, it will eventually and
inevitably be as uncivil as New York City.
Rudeness is a very rational adaptation to
overcrowding. In New York, the very functioning
of the metropolis requires its citizens to be
overaggressive, excessively rude, and callously
uncaring. To be otherwise, means being crushed.
A few years ago a colleague from the city of
New York (pronounced "Manhattan") and I
were going from Lloyd Center to downtown. We were
going to be late if we didn't make the next MAX
train, just coming into view. I broke into a jog
and yelled "come on, we can make it."
Though he was incredulous and doubting, his pace
increased. As we sprinted into the open train
doors, I gave a wave and a smile to the operator.
All my friend could do between gasps as the
train pulled out of the station was to shake his
head and repeat, "this would never
happen in New York." If a New York bus or
subway driver saw someone running, he said, they
would close the doors and speed off all the
earlier.
I always leave Manhattan with cramped
shoulders from trying to ease by so many people
on the streets and sitting in restaurants with
tiny tables without enough room between to
squeeze by without a rear end grazing your water
glass.
During my latest visit to Washington,
DCwhere, as John F. Kennedy once observed,
northern hospitality meets southern
efficiencyI learned that Metrothat
glorious, clean, friendly and efficient train
system was straining at the increased ridership,
due to increased population. The plan for making
it more efficient was to have the train operators
close the doors after 30 seconds, even if people
were still waiting to get on. Efficiency experts
think that this will save 8 seconds per stop. The
effect will be that entering passengers will no
longer wait for exiting passengers to leave the
train first. More people will be carried, but at
a cost of civility.
So, what does this have to do with civility in
Oregon? I come from a small Willamette Valley
town where if two cars were stopped in the road
chatting and another approached, it was likely
that the third driver would get out to visit with
the others. Such is no longer the case in my
hometown.
In Washington, DC, I used to wait for the
Metro train to fully stop before I left my wide
and padded seat. In New York, I've been so
crowded on a subway that personal space is
reduced to a few layers of clothing as one is
sardined groin-to-buttock and with one's face in
another's armpit (all the while not looking
anyone in the eye).
Given enough time and growth, this is the
future of MAX.
In Los Angeles, where citizens are as
effectively crowded as New Yorkers because each
one has a car wrapped around them, the decline of
civility is manifest by road rage.
In the skies, air rage is attributable to
overcrowded airplanes guided between overcrowded
airports by an overtaxed air traffic control
systemall because of population increase.
Yes, there are several other factors affecting
civility, but as Oregon grows in population, it
will inevitably become less civil. Yes,
technology and planning can mitigate the many
downsides of growth, but it cannot mitigate the
loss of elbowroom. (On second thought, actually
we do have ways to mitigate elbowroom
lossProzac and cocaine.)
As elbowroom diminishes, so does civility. Our
conversations will turn from the weather and the
Trailblazers to the best way to get across the
West Hills in rush hour. Portlanders will hotly
debate the Sunset versus 217 just as New Yorkers
argue the Queensboro Bridge versus the Midtown
Tunnel. As we stand in line for our morning
caffeine, pleasant conversations among the
regulars will fade over time into
someonemaybe even youshouting their
order over the shoulder of the customer who took
a millisecond to pocket their change.
The only civil thing to do is to stop growing.
Andy Kerr is founder and president of
Alternatives to Growth Oregon, 503/222-0282, www.AgOregon.org
|