By Mark Salvo and
Andy Kerr
In October, the United States Congress passed
two bills that will add acreage to the National
Wilderness Preservation System; the new units are
in Colorado and Oregon. [1]
Although both bills were debated and presented to
the President only one week apart, they treat
livestock grazing in the new wilderness areas
very differently. In the Oregon case,
conservationists made grazing in wilderness an
issue. For the Colorado legislation, it was not.
The Colorado Canyons National Conservation
Area and Black Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act [2] established
a new conservation area (reserved chiefly for
recreation purposes) and the new Black Ridge
Canyons Wilderness Area of approximately 75,550
acres in western Colorado. Local conservation
interests did not challenge wilderness grazing in
the drafting of the bill. Not surprisingly, the
Colorado legislation followed the trend of
retaining grazing in Black Ridge
Canyonslike every wilderness bill before
it.
In Oregon, however, the Steens Mountain
Cooperative Management and Protection Act [3] set a new
directionit created the nation's first
federal wilderness area that explicitly
excludes domestic livestock grazing. Despite
the express reservation of grazing in wilderness
by the Wilderness Act and subsequent pro-grazing
legislation and congressional reports, [4] the Steens
Mountain legislation zoned 99,859 acres as
livestock-free in the new 174-744-acre Steens
Mountain Wilderness Area.
Oregon conservationists were adamant that
livestock be prohibited from grazing the fragile
mountain meadows and federally designated
"wild and scenic" rivers that descend
from three sides of Steens Mountain. Major
factors that helped force the legislation through
Congress were:
- Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt
threatened to recommend that President
Clinton proclaim Steens Mountain as a
national monument;
- Ongoing litigation concerning livestock
grazing in the Donner und Blitzen Wild
and Scenic River corridor; and,
- A primarily urban congressional
delegation.
Ultimately, conservationists won
livestock-free wilderness in negotiations with
local livestock interests who desperately wanted
some private-public land exchanges to solidify
their operations. The entire Oregon congressional
delegation (five Democrats, two Republicans)
supported the bill.
The great news is that Congress has become
schizophrenic on the subject of grazing in
wilderness; this presents a dramatic opening for
conservationists to change the pro-grazing status
quo. Livestock-free wilderness is the strongest
protection available for public lands. The
challenge and opportunity for the conservation
community is to get no-grazing provisions
("Oregon language") adopted in future
wilderness legislation.
Mark Salvo is grasslands advocate for
American Lands in Portland, Oregon. Andy Kerr is
czar of The Larch Company in Ashland, OR 97520.
Salvo, Mark and Andy Kerr. 2000. Congress
Designates First Livestock-free Wilderness Area. Wild Earth.
Vol. 10, Num. 4. Winter 2000/2001. 55.
___________________
Footnotes
[1]These
pieces of legislation passed subsequent to the
publication last summer of our article
"Livestock Grazing in the National Park and
Wilderness Preservation Systems," Wild Earth
10(2): 45-52, making some of the information
therein, happily, out-of-date.
[2]Colorado
Canyons National Conservation Area and the Black
Ridge Canyons Wilderness (Oct. 24, 2000); Pub. 1,
106-353.
[3]Steens
Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection
Act (Oct. 30, 2000); Pub. I. 106-399.
[4]For
over twenty years, in both legislative and report
language, Congress has clarified and buttressed
its intent that grazing is a permanent use of
wilderness areas. See Colorado Wilderness Act of
1980, Pub. I. No. 96-560 ' 101(f)(1); Utah
Wilderness Act of 1984, Pub. I. No. 98-428 '
301(a); Wyoming Wilderness Act of 1984, Pub. I.
No. 98-550 ' 501; Arizona Desert Wilderness Act
of 1990, Pub. I. 101-628 ' 101(f)(1)(all codified
at 16 USCA ' 1133 notes [1998]) and associated
congressional reports.
|