By Andy Kerr
On March 27, Earth First! co-founder Mike
Roselle and I were arrested for failing to leave
the building where Senator Mark Hatfield
maintains his Portland office. We were charged
with a Class C Misdemeanor, punishable by up to a
$1000 fine and 30 days in jail. We were seeking
to draw attention to the Senator's effort to pass
legislation placing the federal forest agencies
above the law and ordering them to cut down
massive amounts of forest in the name of forest
health.
While Roselle has been arrested on such
matters more than 50 times, it was my first act
of civil disobedience. Until then, my worst
run-ins with the authorities had been speeding
tickets. Exactly two years ago, I was waiting to
receive my invitation from the White House to
participate in the President's Forest Conference
in Portland. Oh, how far I have fallen. I chose
to get arrested and to do so with such a
notorious self-professed radical as Roselle to
dramatize a major effect of the legislation:
forcing straight people out of the system.
If enacted, citizen access to the courts will
be effectively eliminated. If Senator Hatfield
and his fellow timber panderers are successful in
barring the courthouse door against citizens who
want to hold the Forest Service and Bureau of
Land Management accountable to the same
environmental protection laws that the rest of us
have to obey, what choice do mainstream straight
activists such as myself have, but civil
disobedience?
I wore my usual business suit (with an
American flag lapel pin). The Oregonian
called it a "well-staged media event."
That it was. Accompanying me were Roselle as my
civil disobedience advisor and co-conspirator (I
always like to consult with professionals),
photographer (Elizabeth Feryl, Environmental
Images), videographers Ralf Meyer and Karen
Anspacher-Meyer (Greenfire Productions),
publicist (Don Francis, consultant) and attorney
(Gary Kahn, Reeves Kahn and Eder). Roselle
arranged for our direct action coordinators
(Trilly Cannon and Joe Keating), a civil
disobedience term for people who negotiate with
the authorities and manage the event. Perhaps a
dozen supporters were also in attendance.
It is likely that this horrible bill or some
other bill containing such language will be
passed into law by the Republican Congress. The
result is that lawsuits won't be a viable
conservation strategy until the environmental
movement remobilizes its public support.
The Pacific Northwest forest issue has a
tradition of civil disobedience comparable to its
tradition of lawsuits. From 1985 to 1990, Senator
Hatfield, either as chair or ranking minority of
the Senate Appropriations Committee, led the
effort to attach language ("riders") to
annual appropriations bills which limited citizen
access to the courts. The last rider (until now),
dubbed the "Rider From Hell," mandated
a massive cut of old growth forest, and served as
a major catalyzing event for the nationalization
of the region's ancient forest issue.
Civil disobedience centered on the forest
began in 1983 at Bald Mountain in the Siskiyou
Bioregion. ONRC and the Sierra Club had brought
suit to stop the Bald Mountain Road, designed by
the Forest Service to prevent the potential
doubling in size of the Kalmiopsis Wilderness.
Since the Sierra Club was paying the bill, they
were calling the shots on legal strategy. For
political reasons, they were afraid to use the
best legal argument, having to do with the legal
inadequacy of the Forest Service's wilderness
evaluation known as RARE II (second roadless area
review and evaluation). The case was lost. Earth
First!, in one of its first major actions,
conducted a series of blockades and delaying
actions to prevent the bulldozers from doing
their jobs.
The civil disobedients brought such attention
to the area and the issue that ONRC was able to
raise adequate funds for another lawsuit, this
time bringing the arguments that it wanted to
bring all along. In honor of Earth First!'s role,
we made them first name plaintiff (Earth
First! v. Block) perhaps the only time Earth
First! ever sued anyone (they, of course, have
been sued). The suit was successful.
Later, other activities (particularly at the
Millennium Grove in the South Santiam Basin) such
as sitting in trees and blocking logging
equipment served an important role in bringing
media attention to the issue. The Pacific
Northwest Congressional Delegation expended all
the political capital they had to do the Rider
From Hell in 1989. The result was they could not
do it again, until now. The issue divides on
party lines, with Northwest Republicans
supporting such limitations on judicial review
and Northwest Democrats opposing them.
The polls show that the American people still
strongly support environmental protection. But as
a movement, environmentalists have lost this
political connection. Politicians don't pay a
price for voting against the environment. That
must change, and I have seen several positive
steps into the repoliticalization of the
environmental movement at all levels. As part of
that repoliticalization, and as an interim
defensive strategy until we take back our right
of judicial review, civil disobedience must once
again become a tool in the environmentalist's
toolbox. All of us should seriously consider
getting arrested for the cause. I would suggest
that such actions not only take place in the
forest where the destruction is occurring, but at
the door of any politician who votes to bar
citizen access to the courts. When I say all of
us, I don't just mean young and idealistic
students, or fringe-dwelling old hippies, but all
of us in the environmental movement from the CEOs
of the big nationals to volunteers who monitor
timber sales to grandmothers and children.
It should be as politically correct to get
arrested at Senator Hatfield's door protesting
forest destruction as it was to get arrested at
the door of the South African consulate
protesting apartheid. Fortunately for some of us,
it is Roselle's opinion that there is no better
town than Portland, Oregon to get arrested in for
such things. The police have a civil disturbance
unit and are used to civil acts of civil
disobedience.
When I considered the consequences of my act,
I think I was mentally prepared to do the time
for doing the crime. However, I also knew that
for the first offense, it was very likely that I
will be offered at arraignment, instead of a
misdemeanor, an infraction (sort of like a
traffic ticket) and a small fine of $50, which I
will readily pay. It took longer to convince
Hatfield's office, the building authorities and
the Portland Police to arrest us than to be
processed through the criminal justice system. In
Oregon, a misdemeanor conviction can be expunged
in four years. While it might make my
confirmation to the Supreme Court problematic, I
don't expect much other fallout. (The worse
thing was telling my parents that I intended to
get arrested, before they read about it.)
I don't intend to make it my sole form of
advocacy for forests, but civil disobedience will
be one of the tools. In these ugly times,
however, we must all do what we can. A continuous
string of civil acts of civil disobedience at the
politician's door by a broad social range of
environmental activists can make a difference.
There is nothing better to publicize the fact
that the Senator has barred the courthouse door
than to be arrested at his door.
Kerr, Andy. 1995. Civil Disobedience for the
Forest: The Time for Direct Action has Come
Again. Wild Forest Review. April. 14-15.
|