By Andy Kerr
Column #28 - Go to next
column
Length: 747 words
Published: 14 August 1997, Wallowa County
Chieftain
It's official. We humans won. It's time to end
the war on nature.
An article in the journal Science
entitled "Human Domination of Earth's
Ecosystems" should give pause even to those
who take Genesis 1:26 ("Go forth and have
dominion over the Earth....") too literally.
The article speaks to the "human foot
print," that is how much of the Earth and
its resources are dedicated to human use or
abuse.
The scientists note that humans consume more
than half of the Earth's usable surface water;
that carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere have
increased 30% since the Industrial Revolution,
that between one-third and one-half the Earth's
surface has been transformed by human action;
that people have more than doubled the amount of
nitrogen in the environment through mining, use
of fertilizers and burning fossil fuels; and that
human activities "have triggered a wave of
extinctions" with ecological "ripple
effects" that "go beyond the loss of
cute or commercially valuable creatures." It
notes that one quarter of all bird species have
been driven to extinction.
The authors note: "Human alteration of
Earth is substantial and growing.... By these and
other standards, it is clear that we live on a
human-dominated planet."
It's not just than people dominate our nest,
we are fouling it as well. According to the
Environmental Protection Agency, 2,193
fish-consumption advisories because of chemical
contamination were issued in 1996, up 26% over
1995. That represents 5% of the nation's total
stream miles and 15% of total lake acres.
Environmentalists are charged with putting
animals above humans. In fact, they believe in
proper stewardshipnot conquest and
eliminationas called for in Genesis. It is
in people's own self-interest to act
magnanimously victory. If we take care of the
other species and ecosystems, the Earth will take
care of us. If humans are to continue to prosper
as a species, we simply cannot continue to
pollute or eliminate the ecosystems upon which we
depend for air, water and food.
We Earthlings are engaged in the greatest
evolutionary test of all time. With our large
brains and opposable thumbs, people have
conquered the world. Any species or any ecosystem
will live or die because we humans allow it. As
humans, we have no serious predatorssave
ourselves. To date, humans have successfully
out-maneuvered all the environmental checks and
balances that keep any other species within
limits. Our population continues to grow in spite
of diseases like AIDS. Due to environmental
stresses such as toxins in the environment, human
sperm counts are down 50% in the last 30 years.
Rather than address the underlying causes, we can
now do it in test tubes.
As a species, we are orders of magnitude more
successful than any other species. We
havefor the short-term at
leasttranscended any limits.
But nature bats last. In the end, we humans
must learn to live within our means on Earth or
we won't be on Earth, at least not in the exalted
position we are now.
The evolutionarily challenge is whether we, as
a species, will evolve to have the wisdom to
practice something no other species has ever done
or had to do, that is to practice willful
self-restraint. We must learn to live with our
means, both economic and environmental. We must
be concerned about the quality of our people, not
the quantity of people.
Will we as a species learn that our long-term
survival, as well as our short-term real comfort,
depends upon a healthy, clean and diverse planet?
I believe we can. The Chinese ideogram for
"crisis" is a combination of their
ideograms for "danger" and
"opportunity."
Making the human foot print smaller doesn't
mean diminishing our quality of life. It means
scaling back our impact and presence on Earth to
levels that are sustainable.
If you are still feeling the need to exploit
the Earth so you can get what you feel is your
fair share, it's time to redirect your energies
to demand a more fair allocation of human wealth.
The net worth of the Earth's 358 known
billionaires is $760 billion, equal to the net
worth of the Earth's 2.5 billion poorest
residents. There is enough to go around. It's
just that some people have too much and many
others not enough.
Enough, if we stabilize population at a
sustainable level. The human population is about
6 billion now, going on 10 billion.
Go to next column
Go back to column
index
|