By Andy Kerr
Column #16 - Go to next
column
Length: 748 words
First published: 27 January 1997, Wallowa
County Chieftain
The National Forest System contains at least
370,000 miles of roads. It's probably more, but
the Forest Service hasn't documented them all.
That's at least eight times more than the
Interstate Highway System or all the way to the
to the moon and half-way back. Many of these
roads are harmful to both the environment and the
taxpayers. It's time to close a large part of the
federal forest road system.
Roads which are extremely damaging to nature,
extremely expensive to maintain and/or are of
little public value, should be put to bed. Of
course, many Forest Service roads should remain
open to provide access to recreation areas and
scenic viewpoints. The remaining road
systemwhile much shorterwould be
better maintained for public use and to prevent
environmental harm.
By their very nature, roads are unfriendly to
nature. Road kill on high-speed routes are the
most obvious effect, but probably not the most
important. The vast majority of Forest Service
roads are low-speed roads built for logging.
Logging is decreasing and will likely continue to
do so, along with taxpayer dollars to maintain
such roads.
Roadsif they do stay in
placefragment wildlife habitat and inhibit
wildlife migration; serve as introduction
corridors for non-native wildlife, diseases and
weeds; increase erosion and stream sedimentation;
and increase opportunities to for off-road
vehicle abuse and poaching.
Forest roads increase the "edge
effect," which allow opportunistic species
such as raccoons greater access into previously
intact interior forest habitat. This has been
extremely devastating for many songbird species.
The greater the density of roads, the less
value to wildlife. Take elk for example, where
habitat effectiveness decreases at least 25% when
road densities reach one mile of road for each
square mile of land, and at least 50% when that's
doubled to two miles of road.
Roadsif they don't stay in
placeslide out and cause massive amounts of
dirt to foul streams to the extreme detriment of
salmon, other fish species and the aquatic
ecosystem in general. This has been happening a
lot of late, now that we're back to a more normal
wet winter pattern in the Pacific Northwest.
With the recent heavy rains and floods (which
are essentially annual events), numerous federal
forest roads no longer exist. Because of
diminishing agency budgets, most won't be
rebuilt. Some will be proposed to be rebuilt that
shouldn't be. Some were simply in a wrong
location like a flood plain and will fail again
during the next big flood. Some were on steep
slopes which are still prone to failure.
Lot's of roads are ticking time bombs waiting
for the next heavy rains to set them off. The
Forest Service should proactively close these
roads, but not just be gating. It must take steps
to make the problem roads "hydrologically
invisible" to the hillside by putting water
bars every 50-100 feet to divert surface water
back to it's natural flow.
Such bars are little trenches put across the
road to guide upslope water directly downslope,
rather than channeling and concentrating it to
culverts; many of which are too small to carry
maximum flows. Culverts are also often a barrier
and to migrating fish.
This waterbar work and culvert removal is very
cost-effective and could provide transition jobs
in the woods for equipment operators who won't be
doing as much logging as in times past. There is
plenty of watershed restoration work to fill out
the work lives of these displaced woods workers.
The Siuslaw National Forest used to produce a
lot of salmon. As logging increased, salmon
decreased. Today, coho, chinook, steelhead and
cutthroat trout are all proposed for the
endangered species list and the Forest Service is
slowly realizing that the forest is more valuable
for salmon, water, wildlife and recreation than
logging. The President's Northwest Forest Plan
dropped the timber cut on the Siuslaw in excess
of 90%. It's closing and restoring two-thirds of
its road system.
It is a model that should and will likely be
followed by other national forests.
Many national forests are closing ranger
district offices and cutting staff positions, as
Congress reduces the Forest Service budget. A
coalition of environmentalists and fiscal
conservatives may finally be able to do good for
both the taxpayers and the environment and
persuade Congress to cut the Forest Service
road-building budget and allocate money to
watershed restoration.
It's something that salmon and the taxpayers
can agree on.
Go to next column
Go back to column
index
|